My husband and I have often talked about spanking as a form of discipline.  This is one topic that parents get all flustered about as they argue their personal view and try to unveil the most loving, effective and ethical way to discipline.

I’m not much of an ‘all or nothing’ kinda gal in my parenting advice, but when talking with husband about spanking he said something that has really made me think.

He asked, “Would it make a difference if I hit you… just once? ” Well, yeah, I wouldn’t stand for it, even once… one little hit and he’s outta here.  In my opinion, hitting people you love is wrong and once is one time too many.  With hitting… it is all or nothing.

What if we, as a society, still did “lashes” for small offenses?  Say, someone lies to you and you respond, “That is unacceptable behavior, now turn around while I hit you for it.”  Or you’re in Kroger and the cashier responds with a snide comment or “talks back to you” then you reach up and punch them in the bum?  “No” you say, that is barbaric.  I’ll agree – the quick, passionate barbaric punch may be a bit over the top.

But if it is a calculated, quick, passionate barbaric hit, lash or spank is it any better?  Spanking shouldn’t be out of anger, right?  But if someone was calculating and calm when they hit you, wouldn’t it be every eerier and more barbaric?  Would it matter if someone was calm when they hit you as opposed to angry?  Would it matter if it happened as a rule, or happened only once?  How would it affect your relationship with that person?

Is there a difference in spanking children as a rule and occasionally spanking  because nothing else seemed to work?  If you’re against spanking in general, does it makes a difference if you slip once or twice and spank?  Hmmm… some very meaty food for thought.

Btw, said husband doesn’t hit, at all.  I’m proud to say that his love for me and his children abounds and builds confidence without having to prove his strength.

What do you think about occasional spanking vs. spanking as a rule?